Carbohydrates and Gut Pathogens Untitled

Gut Microorganisms and the GI Tract:
The Lastest Research


Microbial Toxins Influence Most Digestive Symptoms

 

Main Menu


How SCD Eliminates the Harmful Gut Microorganisms

Why and how SCD eliminates the harmful gut bacteria:

Complex sugars and starches are the preferred food supply of gut pathogens. SCD eradicates these harmful bacteria by restricting the use of complex carbohydrates. They are much more difficult to digest than simple carbohydrates because they must be split into simple sugars before entering the blood stream. This is a problem for a compromised digestive system. Carbohydrates not absorbed into the blood stream become available food for harmful gut bacteria.

SCD excels because it excludes them and permits only monosaccharide carbohydrates, the type easy to digest because once absorbed, they vanish into the bloodstream before the bacteria can access them.

Two out of the following three research articles use The Hydrogen Breath test to measure amounts of anaerobic bacteria. ("anaerobic" is a technical word which means without air )

ABOUT THE HYDROGEN BREATH TEST
The hydrogen breath test utilizes the hydrogen measurement in the breath to diagnose several conditions that cause gastrointestinal symptoms.

Anaerobic bacteria are the only bacteria in the colon capable of producing hydrogen in humans. The gas develops as the result of exposure to unabsorbed food, particularly sugars and other carbohydrates like starch. Limited hydrogen is produced from the small amounts of unabsorbed food that normally reach the colon. Even larger amounts of hydrogen are present when there is a problem with food digestion and absorption in the small intestine. An environment is created that allows more unabsorbed food to reach the colon. Large amounts of hydrogen can also occur when colonic bacteria move back into the small intestine. ( "bacterial overgrowth" of the small bowel.) Once exposed to unabsorbed food, the bacteria are unable to completely traverse the small intestine to become fully digested and absorbed. Instead, some of the hydrogen produced is absorbed into the blood as it flows through the wall of the small intestine and colon and travels to the lungs. This hydrogen is released along with exhaled breath and can be measured.

The information above was taken from this website:
http://www.medicinenet.com/hydrogen_breath_test/article.htm

Supporting Research from PubMed:

Scientific Article #1

An important scientific experiment shows that the sugars that are prohibited from the SCD diet feed the anaerobic bacteria in the gut.

When patients with GI problems consumed complex sugars, the hydrogen test showed increases bacterial counts. (There is one exception: fructose). Fructose is a simple sugar; yet that sugar which is not complex also produces an increase in bacterial levels. Today's fructose is made from corn starch and impurities remain and fructose that is used for experiments is now made from corn, so it acts like an SCD illegal sugar.

Websites about how fructose is manufactured from corn:
http://ific.org/nutrition/sugars/index.cfm?renderforprint=1

The following Israeli paper shows that the sugars that are not allowed by SCD lead to an increase in bacterial count. These sugars are not well absorbed and contribute to digestive problems:
View this article in PubMed
1: Isr Med Assoc J. 2000 Aug;2(8):583-7.

Carbohydrate malabsorption and the effect of dietary restriction on symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome and functional bowel complaints.

Goldstein R, Braverman D, Stankiewicz H.

Gastroenterology Institute, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.

BACKGROUND: Carbohydrate malabsorption of lactose, fructose and sorbitol has already been described in normal volunteers and in patients with functional bowel complaints including irritable bowel syndrome. Elimination of the offending sugar(s) should result in clinical improvement. OBJECTIVE: To examine the importance of carbohydrate malabsorption in outpatients previously diagnosed as having functional bowel disorders, and to estimate the degree of clinical improvement following dietary restriction of the malabsorbed sugar(s). METHODS: A cohort of 239 patients defined as functional bowel complaints was divided into a group of 94 patients who met the Rome criteria for irritable bowel syndrome and a second group of 145 patients who did not fulfill these criteria and were defined as functional complaints. Lactose (18 g), fructose (25 g) and a mixture of fructose (25 g) plus sorbitol (5 g) solutions were administered at weekly intervals. End-expiratory hydrogen and methane breath samples were collected at 30 minute intervals for 4 hours. Incomplete absorption was defined as an increment in breath hydrogen of at least 20 ppm, or its equivalent in methane of at least 5 ppm. All patients received a diet without the offending sugar(s) for one month. RESULTS: Only 7% of patients with IBS and 8% of patients with FC absorbed all three sugars normally. The frequency of isolated lactose malabsorption was 16% and 12% respectively. The association of lactose and fructose-sorbitol malabsorption occurred in 61% of both patient groups. The frequency of sugar malabsorption among patients in both groups was 78% for lactose malabsorption (IBS 82%, FC 75%), 44% for fructose malabsorption and 73% for fructose-sorbitol malabsorption (IBS 70%, FC 75%). A marked improvement occurred in 56% of IBS and 60% of FC patients following dietary restriction. The number of symptoms decreased significantly in both groups (P < 0.01) and correlated with the improvement index (IBS P < 0.05, FC P < 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Combined sugar malabsorption patterns are common in functional bowel disorders and may contribute to symptomatology in most patients. Dietary restriction of the offending sugar(s) should be implemented before the institution of drug therapy.

PMID: 10979349 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


Scientific Article #2

Research paper #2 proves that bacterial fermentation is caused by unabsorbed starches. Half of the volunteers were fed starches together with acarbose, an inhibitor that would make them unable to absorb the starches. The volunteers who took acarbose were unable to digest their starches and showed signs of having increased bacterial counts in the colon.

View this article in PubMed
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi? cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=3053313&query_hl=11 1: Gastroenterology. 1988 Dec;95(6):1549-55.

Effect of starch malabsorption on colonic function and metabolism in humans.

Scheppach W, Fabian C, Ahrens F, Spengler M, Kasper H.

Department of Medicine, Wuerzburg University, Federal Republic of Germany.

To study the impact of starch on colonic function and metabolism, 12 healthy volunteers consumed a controlled diet rich in starch for two 4-wk periods. In one of the study periods they received the glucosidase inhibitor acarbose (BAY g 5421) and placebo in the other. Stool wet weight increased by 68%, stool dry weight by 57%, fecal water content by 73%, and the mean transit time by 30% on acarbose. Breath hydrogen was significantly higher on acarbose, indicating stimulated carbohydrate fermentation in the colon. Fecal bacterial mass (+78%), total stool nitrogen (+53%), bacterial nitrogen (+200%), and stool fat (+56%) were higher in the acarbose than in the control period. The stimulation of fermentation in the human large intestine may be important in colonic and possibly other diseases.

Explanation of fermentation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermentation_%28food%29


Scientific Article #3

Sorbitol is another carb that is not allowed on SCD. This research paper shows that consumption of Sorbitol produced an increase of bacterial counts on the hydrogen test.

View this article in PubMed
Website that explains that Anaerobic Bacteria are mostly pathogenic.
View the website

The home page of this website indicates that it is affiliated with the University of California at San Diego Medical School.
http://www.ratsteachmicro.com Untitled

This website is under construction.